Globalization is the target of many critics today. The young see it as a malign force in regard to social agendas. The workers see it as a pernicious force in regard to their economic well-being. But both sets of fears, and resulting opposition to (economic) globalization, especially via trade and multinationals, are mistaken.Mistaken? Strong words in the face of this current economic crisis. But Bhagwati is adament that on balance, trade has been good not only for the rich but also for the poor. He argues that the global movement for gender parity, for example, owes much to the fact that "industries competing in the world economy face fierce competition and cannot afford to indulge their prejudice against women." As companies compete for labor in order to meet export demand, they are forced to offer women the same (or similar) wages and benefits to attract strong talent. Thus, the economic impact of globalization filters into a nation's social consciousness.
Bhagwati could not resist taking a jab at his equally famous colleague, the Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, whom Diane metioned in a post yesterday. Stiglitiz has claimed free trade provides little benefit to developing countries, an assertion Bhagwati dismisses as "nonsense."
Strong words for tough times.