Based on site visits to four detention facilities and three thematic hearings on the rights of immigrants in the United States, as well as consultation with ICE officials, immigration experts, attorneys, detainees and their families, and analysis of relevant reports and research by state agencies, non-profits, and media, the IACHR focused on several areas of concern, highlighting the increasing criminalization of immigration detention and glaring failures in oversight:
- ICE's presumption of the necessity of detention even though immigration violations are governed by civil rather than criminal law;
- The disproportionate nature of the punishment, and the under-utilization of less punitive alternatives to detention;
- ICE's increase in partnerships with local and state law enforcement without sufficient oversight of their actions;
- The criminal rather than civil nature of the detention system;
- ICE's outsourcing of the detention system to private contractors without sufficient supervision; and
- The impact of detention on immigrants' due process rights, particularly the right to representation, especially with respect to unaccompanied children, the disabled, and those unable to represent themselves.
Will the combined voices of its neighbors (including one of our own, Dinah Shelton) help to prod domestic immigration reform in the U.S.? Predictably, though disappointingly, the Obama Administration responded to a draft of the report by reiterating that many of the sources of law cited by the IACHR in the report, including the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, do not give rise to binding obligations on the United States. The IACHR jabbed back, noting in the report that "the American Declaration is indeed an instrument that generates international obligations in the framework of the [OAS] Charter" and declaring its intention to follow up to ensure the United States' full compliance with its recommendations "within the framework of its functions and competencies." And interestingly, Spain may be in the IACHR's corner, having funded the publication of the report, though demurring as to its own views on the issue. This IntLawGrrl, for one, eagerly awaits the IACHR's next punch . . .