Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Monday, December 10, 2012

On December 10

On this day in ...
... 1931, the Nobel Peace Prize was bestowed on Jane Addams; she was a co-winner with Nicholas Murray Butler. Nobel Committee Chair Halvdan Koht said in his presentation speech:
(credit)
'America helped – perhaps it would be more correct to say compelled – Europe to create a League of Nations which would provide a firm basis for peaceful coexistence among nations. It was a crushing blow that America herself did not join this organization, and without doubt her failure to do so contributed largely to the failure of the League of Nations to live up to expectations. We still see too much of the old rivalries of power politics. Had the United States joined, she would have been a natural mediator between many of the conflicting forces in Europe, for America is more interested in peace in Europe than in lending her support to any particular country.
'It must be said, however, that the United States is not the power for peace in the world that we should have wished her to be. She has sometimes let herself drift into the imperialism which is the natural outcome of industrial capitalism in our age. In many ways she is typical of the wildest form of capitalist society, and this has inevitably left its mark on American politics.
'But America has at the same time fostered some of the most spirited idealism on earth.'
A longtime advocate of peace, suffrage, and measures to alleviate poverty, Addams was emblematic of that idealism – of "the work which women can do peace fraternity among nations," Koht continued. But Addams, who was then 71 years old, was admitted to a hospital in Baltimore on this day in 1931, and so was unable to attend the ceremony in Oslo, Norway. She would die 4 years later in the city where she had long lived, Chicago. We IntLawGrrls honor her as a transnational foremother.

(Prior December 10 posts are here, here, here, here, and here.)

Monday, October 15, 2012

Write On! "Poverty, Immigration, and Property"

(Write On! is an occasional item about notable calls for papers)

Association of American Law Schools faculty members are invited to take part in the 2013 Mid-Year Meeting Workshop on Poverty, Immigration and Property welcome proposals for breakout-session presentations and papers. Publication is possible.
The workshop, to be held June 10-12, 2013 in San Diego, California, aims to appeal to a range of teachers and scholars.
Invited are proposals on any area within the subjects of the workshop title; themes may include:
► Access to Justice (Labor Camps, Counsel, Language)
► Property Implications of Immigration Enforcement
► International: Land Distribution, Land Reform, Forced Migration
► Race and Property/Race and Immigration
► Climate Refugees: Property, Poverty, Immigration
► Progressive Property: Pro and Con
► Welfare Rights for Immigrants
► Employer Sanctions and Licensing
► Property Formalization
► Home, Housing and Culture
► Property and Citizenship
Interested AALS-eligible faculty members should e-mail a  description, in no more than 1,000 words, of the proposed presentation or paper, along with a résumé, to 13pipproposals@aals.org. Deadline is October 26, 2012.
For further information, contact the Planning Committee members:D. Benjamin Barros, Widener University School of Law, at dbbarros@widener.edu; Sheila R. Foster, Fordham University School of Law, Chair, at sfoster@law.fordham.edu; Bill O. Hing, University of San Francisco School of Law, at bhing@usfca.edu; Beth Lyon, Villanova University School of Law, at lyon@law.villanova.edu; and Ezra E.S. Rosser, American University, Washington College of Law, at erosser@wcl.american.edu.

Friday, August 17, 2012

"Women are leading United Nations efforts"

(It is IntLawGrrls' immense honor today to welcome United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, whose staff has given us permission to reprint in full his "Remarks to the World Congress of Global Partnership for Young Women," delivered this Monday in Seoul, Republic of Korea)

I am very happy to be here.
What a wonderful conference.
Looking at all of you, I see the world represented. Many of you travelled long distances – from other parts of Asia, from Africa and beyond. You bring a truly global dimension to this World Congress. Welcome.
Whether you came from near or far, your journey to this Conference is part of an important trend of women standing taller and taller in the international arena.
Today I want to discuss women’s leadership from peace to development at the United Nations and around the world. I will share my vision for greater engagement. And I will tell you specifically what I am doing to accomplish that critical goal.
The story of women is about crossing frontiers, breaking boundaries and charting a new path. It is a story told in numbers, percentages and statistics. But ultimately, this is a story about people. And you are writing that story – you young women and men are the authors and the actors.
I was raised on the teachings of Confucius. He said,
'To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must put the family in order.'
As Secretary-General, I must first make women’s advancement a priority in my own “family” – that is the United Nations.
When I began my term, there had been very few women peace envoys in the history of United Nations. I set out to change this. Now we have more female envoys than ever before.
Some people ask whether a woman can command a force of thousands or tens of thousands of troops. My answer is: Watch and learn. I named women to head some of our most difficult peacekeeping operations. Our missions in Liberia, the Central African Republic and South Sudan are all led by women. In total I have appointed seven female Special Representatives.
My senior legal adviser is a woman. My most senior police official is a woman too. So is my Chef de Cabinet. I have increased senior female appointments at the level of Under-Secretary-General by 60 per cent, and at the Assistant Secretary-General level by 40 per cent.
Women are leading United Nations efforts across the board – in peacekeeping, development and human rights.
But, we want more qualified women throughout our ranks. We are working to increase female representation across our middle management.
Wherever I go, I raise the issue of women’s empowerment with governments. That is because although there has been important progress, women still do not have a strong enough voice in decision-making. Women make up just a fraction of all chief executives of the world’s biggest companies. Fewer than one in ten presidents or prime ministers are women. And less than one in five parliamentarians are women. This world statistic is reflected here in the Republic of Korea.
The lack of women’s representation – of women’s empowerment -- affects individual women’s rights – and it holds back whole countries.
One recent UN study showed that limits on women’s economic participation cost the Asia-Pacific region nearly $90 billion each year in lost productivity.

That is why I am so grateful that Duksung University and UN Women decided to focus their cooperation on the UN Women Young Women’s Partnership Programme, including the Asia-Africa Programme.
Africa is a young continent. More than two thirds of all people there are under the age of 30. I have seen Africa’s youth in action. Africa’s women are driving progress. They carry crops and children … they lead peaceful demonstrations and they head governments … they win the Nobel Peace Prize and they score even greater rewards knowing they are making a difference in our world.
Gender discrimination blocks progress. Equality makes it possible to achieve huge breakthroughs.
Helping women is critical to reaching the Millennium Development Goals by the year 2015.
Women do more work for less pay than men. Women produce up to 80 per cent of all food in sub-Saharan Africa. But their households are poorer, so they spend more of their income on food. They own far less land than men.
On education, millions more girls are in primary school than before. But there are far more girls shut out of class than boys. Two thirds of the 780 million people in the world who cannot read are women.
We have made progress in driving down maternal mortality. But a woman still dies every minute and a half from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth. This is a tragedy we can stop. I am spearheading a global movement called Every Woman Every Child to end these needless deaths, and to protect all children from preventable diseases.
We are moving on all fronts to invest in women so they can reach their full potential, drive development and lead us to a better future.
At the same time, we are looking beyond 2015. I have just appointed a High-Level Panel on the UN Development Agenda after 2015. I deliberately included many prominent women on the panel, and I count on the men to take gender concerns as seriously as I do. Reaching the MDGs and advancing to the next stage will only be possible when we unleash the power of women.
Women will only flourish when they are safe. That is why I am also leading a global campaign called UNiTE to End Violence against Women.
Around the world, more and more people realize that abusing or attacking women is a moral outrage and a criminal offence.
In Fiji, for example, the UN is sponsoring a programme that helps communities come together to report anyone who attacks women to the police. The results are clear. Men are showing more respect. Last year, 15 communities joined the effort, and that number is expected to double by the end of this year.
We need to end violence, give women a say in decision-making, protect their health and ensure equal opportunities. All of these challenges are at the top of the UN’s agenda – and they are on your agenda. The UN Women-Duksung Women’s University Global Partnership for Young Women is a wonderful initiative with enormous potential.
Ladies and gentlemen – but especially ladies,
Four years ago, I had the chance to meet Yi So-yeon, the first Korean astronaut who carried the UN flag into outer space. At the time, she was barely 30 years old.
I was deeply honoured when she presented me with that special UN flag. I immediately hung it on the wall in my office.
Yi So-yeon once said,
'I want to show a side of women: that we also have great abilities. To me that is the biggest goal.'
That blue banner reminds me that women can go anywhere – even to outer space – and that they can take the values of the United Nations with them.
Our values – peace, human rights, opportunity and dignity for all people – are universal values. You do not need a flag to uphold them. You do not need a spaceship. All you need is the determination to stand up for what is right.
Young women should dream big. Look to the stars. Think of the grandmothers, mothers and other women who came before you – how hard they struggled and how much they accomplished. And think of the daughters, sisters and friends who will follow in your footsteps.
I count on each of you to build a new future where women are truly equal, and the whole world can benefit.
Thank you.

[photos, from top: Secretary-General Ban swears in Patricia O'Brien of Ireland as Under-Secretary for Legal Affairs and United Nations Legal Counsel (credit for 2008 UN photo); Karin Landgren of Sweden, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Liberia (credit for UN photo); Rima Salah of Jordan, Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General, United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (credit for UN photo); Secretary-General Ban with Hilde Johnson of Norway,  Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan credit for 2011 UN photo by Evan Schneider; Susanna Malcorra of Argentina, Secretary-General's Chef de Cabinet (credit for UN photo); Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, President of Liberia, co-winner of 2011 Nobel Peace Prize, and co-chair of High-Level Panel just appointed by Secretary-General Ban (photo credit); Korean astronaut Yi So-yeon with Secretary-General Ban and UN flag (credit for 2008 UN photo)]

Friday, July 6, 2012

G-20 2012 on Trade

(credit)
The Declaration issued at the conclusion of the G-20 Summit on June 19 has reiterated the commitment of the world’s largest twenty economies to free trade and open markets. At least in words, the leaders have pledged to avoid taking actions that have the goal of protecting their national economies at the expense of free and global trade.
The Group of Twenty, or G-20, comprises the finance ministers and central bank governors of 19 countries and of the European Union, who have met annually since 1999 to promote dialogue between industrialized and emerging-market countries. The G-20 summits of the Heads of State began in 2008 in response to the financial crisis. The focus of G-20 discussions on trade issues is how members can best structure policy to contribute to restoring global economic health and financial stability. At this year's summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, the leaders again committed to avoid protectionism and to pursue continued negotiations at the World Trade Organization.

On Protectionism
Always a threat, the risk of protectionism increases during periods of economic and financial crisis, such as the one into which the world has been thrown since 2008.
Protectionist measures are actions taken by a government to artificially increase the competitiveness of its products. Tariffs or import duties are the most obvious and used method. For example, to aid the ailing U.S. car industry, one tool available to the U.S. Government would have been to place a duty on all cars being imported into the U.S. market. A sufficiently high duty would have made imported cars so expensive that it would have deterred all but the wealthiest of Americans from buying them. Presumably, then, U.S. consumers would have increasingly turned to American-made cars simply because they would have been cheaper than any imported cars. However, taking this course of action would have placed the United States in violation of its mandatory commitments as a WTO member and of its voluntary commitments made at previous G-20 summits.
Economists agree that it was the use of tariffs and other such trade protectionist measures that worsened and prolonged the Great Depression of the 1930s. In our globalized economy, any efforts taken by one country to protect its companies at the expense of others threatens to further curtail economic growth.
 Mindful of this history, governments have been remarkably consistent in avoiding the use of protectionist tools.
As the crisis continues, spreads, and deepens, however, monitors are reporting the increased use of tariffs and other less transparent measures:

Global Trade Alert, a monitoring service based in Europe, has reported that trade protectionism is “alive and well”.
► At the request of the G-20, the WTO has also begun issuing a Trade Monitoring Report.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Newest woman head of state pulls Malawi welcome mat away from Bashir

Joyce Banda's been busy in the month since she became the President of Malawi.
Her latest move: on Friday she reversed her country's policy regarding the International Criminal Court.
Last year, during the rule of its former President, Malawi welcomed Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir when Malawi hosted Common Market for the Eastern and Southern Africa summit. (prior post)
But this year the new President, Banda, hid the welcome mat.
A month ago today, Banda was sworn in as the 1st woman in southern Africa to lead her country, and the 3d woman in Africa to be head of state; in this, she follows 2011 Nobel Peace Prizewinner Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Liberia's President since 2006, and an IntLawGrrls foremother, Zewditu I, Empress of Ethiopia from 1916 to 1930.
Banda has asked the African Union not to permit Bashir to attend a summit set to be held in Malawi later this year.
A representative of Sudan responded that it has a "right" to attend the summit.
Banda explained her requested at a press conference Friday in the capital city, Lilongwe:
'Malawi is already going through unprecedented economic problems and it would not be prudent enough to take a risk by allowing one person to come and attend the summit against much resistance from our cooperating partners and donors.'
Bashir's presence last year, Banda asserted, "cost Malawi US$ 350.7 million from the US Millennium Challenge Corporation meant to rejuvenate Malawi's fledgling power supply." The loss is significant for Malawi, which ranks 171 out of 187 countries measured in the U.N. Development Programme's International Development Index.

The snub of Bashir is one of several bold moves by the woman whom Forbes Africa named the 3d most powerful woman in Africa back when she still was Vice President. (credit for Reuters photo of Banda, with Malawi's flag in background) In these other moves, she:
►  Averted an reported coup plot in the days after her predecessor's death.
►  Moved Britain to re-warm diplomatic relations, which chilled last year.
►  Fired the national police chief, appointed by her predecessor and "accused of instilling a climate of fear including arbitrary arrests and the shooting dead of 19 people during anti-government protests last year."
Fired the wife of her predecessor; he'd appointed her to a lucrative foundation post.
►  Reaffirmed her commitment to women's rights by referring to her own "'brave'" decision to leave an abusive marriage.
►  Told a reporter:
'You ask how I feel to be the first female president in Southern Africa? If I fail, I will have failed all the women of the region. But for me to succeed, they must all rally around.'

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

On April 3

On this day in ...
... 1807 (205 years ago today), Mary Carpenter (right) was born into the family of a Unitarian minister in Exeter, in Great Britain. (photo credit) Educated at her father's school, she became a governesss at age 20; then, 2 years later, she and her mother opened a small girls school. By the mid-1830s she was active in working on behalf of the poor, founding a "ragged school" for poor children in Bristol. This led to interest in the fate of young persons caught up in the criminal justice system and, in 1852, establishment of a reform school. She published widely and campaigned for women's suffrage and for educational reform statutes. A frequent visitor to India, she pushed for reform there as well. Carpenter died in Bristol in 1877.

(Prior April 3 posts are here, here, here, here, and here.)

Thursday, December 8, 2011

State responsibility & health

On my recent visit to Amsterdam, a tour guide delivered a cliché dig:
"Here in the Netherlands, we have access to excellent health care," he told the multinational gaggle of tourists following him about the city. Then, looking at me, he added, "Sorry about that, United States."
The comment pointed to a longstanding difference in views of a government's responsibility for the health of its people. In much of the developed world -- Canada and European countries, for example -- the state long has guaranteed a baseline of adequate health care. That political decision reflects a principle articulated more than a half-century ago in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a document that is informed by views on human rights and human security that were mainstream in mid-20th C. America, as I've written here. Article 25(1) of the Universal Declaration states:

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

Article 12(1) of the 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, moreover, provides that its

States Parties ... recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

The United States is not party to the Covenant, however, and claims of an affirmative state duty seldom have won much acceptance Stateside. (But see here.) A notable exception was the inclusion of a right to health care in the 2008 Democratic Party platform. That plank helped to produce "President Obama's signature legislative achievement," as The New York Times aptly called it; that is, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. (credit for photo of Obama signing the health care statute)
The Act requires everyone in the United States to obtain health insurance by 2014; noncompliance carries a tax penalty. This minimum coverage mandate is the linchpin of a broad-based coverage program. It promises insurers a pool of healthy payers who can help to subsidize the less healthy -- even persons who join the pool with pre-existing medical conditions.
This is evident in cases to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, over the course of 5-1/2 hours, on a June 2012 day yet to be set. (credit for above right photo of Supreme Court building)
► The merits question in Case No. 11-398, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida, is "[w]hether Congress had the power under Article I of the Constitution to enact the minimum coverage provision." (Questions about the Court's authority and the Act's severability also will be argued, as detailed here.)
► Meanwhile, in Case No. 11-400, Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services, more than 2 dozen constituent states asked the Court to decide whether "Congress exceed[s] its enumerated powers and violate[s] basic principles of federalism when it coerces States into accepting onerous conditions that it could not impose directly by threatening to withhold all federal funding under the single largest grant-in-aid program"; that is, the Medicaid program that provides care for America's poor.
Answer to these questions invites consideration of numerous clauses of Article I § 8 of the Constitution, empowering Congress' to, inter alia: "pay the Debts and provide for the ... general Welfare of the United States"; "regulate Commerce ... among the several States"; and "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers."
At least for the international-law-trained lawyer, it also invites consideration of documents articulating a right to health. Given the dearth of overt consultation of foreign law after some criticized the Court's reasoning in Roper v. Simmons (2005), however, it seems unlikely that the expected dozens of amicus briefs will dwell on that.
Yet the question of a right to health will rest just beneath the surface of much argument about the powers and duties of government -- not only the government of the United States, but also those of its constituent states.


Friday, November 25, 2011

On November 25

On this day in ...
... 1911 (100 years ago today), Mexican revolutionary leader Emiliano Zapata announced the Plan de Ayala, "which stated that the goal of the revolution was for land to be redistributed among the poor." He and his supporter then fought against a government that had come into power as a result of a joint rebellion earlier in the year. Zapata (right) would continue to fight until his assassination on April 10, 1919. (photo credit)

(Prior November 25 posts are here, here, here, and here.)

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Go On! Human Rights and the Global Economy

(Go On! is an occasional item on symposia and other events of interest)

With the recent and continuing global economic and financial crisis, the new "Occupy Wall Street" movement around the world, and the old and ongoing crisis of poverty, violence, and discrimination, it is no surprise that advocates and scholars are focusing on the theme of "human rights and the global economy."
The Social Science Research Network abstracts journal sponsored by Northeastern's Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy, Human Rights and the Global Economy (co-edited by Wendy Parmet, George and Kathleen Matthews, Distinguished Professor, Rashmi Dyal-Chand, Professor of Law, and yours truly, IntLawGrrl and Professor of Law Hope Lewis), recently received an announcement that describes an interesting independent conference on these themes sponsored by colleagues at the Center for Public Scholarship at the New School for Social Research and its journal, Social Research. Here it is:

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
Wednesday and Thursday, November 9-10, 2011
John Tishman Auditorium, 66 West 12th Street, NYC

The Center for Public Scholarship presents the 25th conference from the Social Research journal at The New School. Join us as experts and scholars discuss human rights as a mediating language for discussions about social justice and the global economy. How does a wealthy nation determine what they can do to alleviate global poverty? What are the ethical obligations and how can such assistance be mutually beneficial? What are the human rights responsibilities and obligations of international financial institutions and corporations? Where are the opportunities in economic policies and institutions to strengthen human rights policies around the world and improve social justice?
Full program and registration available here.
Keynote on Wednesday, November 9, 2011 6:00 p.m.
Olivier De Schutter [right], United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, will discuss the role of human rights in shaping international regimes
See conference site for regular registration fee.
All students (with valid ID): Free
All New School faculty, staff and alumni (with valid ID): Free
Contact: cps@newschool.edu or 917-534-9330
The conference is made possible with generous support from the Climate Change Narratives, Rights and the Poor project at the Chr.Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Bergen, Norway.


Saturday, September 17, 2011

Morocco's future depends on women

(Delighted to welcome back alumna Christie Edwards, who contributes this guest post)

Thanks to the American Society of International Law Helton Fellowship Program, I spent several months in Morocco last year working with local nongovernmental organizations and researching female literacy, among other women’s issues.
Morocco is typically hailed as a beacon for women’s rights in the Middle East and North Africa, having:
► Passed a new Moroccan Family Code six years ago; and
► Announced the intention to remove all reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
Additionally, Morocco has set ambitious goals for increased access to education and economic participation for women and girls as key strategies for the country’s economic development. (credit for Global Fund for Women photo of young women studying in Morocco)
However, underneath all of the positive publicity lies a rather heartbreaking reality for many Moroccan women: recent surveys in Morocco estimated the country’s illiteracy rate to be approximately 55% of all women. Fully 90% of rural women in Morocco are illiterate.
Due to the positive link between poverty and illiteracy, literacy programs are strategically linked to development programs in impoverished areas so that the beneficiaries, particularly women and girls, gain access to education. However, implementation of education and literacy programs has been sporadic and inconsistent due to the enormity of the problem of women’s illiteracy and the complexity of the solutions proposed by the government, international aid donors, educators, civil society groups, and Moroccan women.
Although women are increasingly joining the informal and formal work force, one of the biggest obstacles to upward mobility for women is their primary responsibility for caretaking in the home, which prevents them from pursuing educational opportunities or fully participating in the public economic sphere.
Although Morocco has made great strides to make primary education for children universal, girls frequently feel that their parents diminish the value of their education and prevent them from attending school because they are “only destined for marriage and motherhood.”
As a consequence of Morocco’s high child labor rates, with tens of thousands of girls under fifteen working as child domestics, working in the textile industry, or apprenticing in traditional arts and crafts. Many girls do not enroll, or they drop out of school. The dramatic dropout rate of girls at the secondary school level -- at 50% in urban areas and 89% in rural areas -- is a direct contributing factor to adult female illiteracy. As girls enter adulthood, prevailing societal attitudes and logistical difficulties further prevent women from gaining access to schools or literacy programs.
As Morocco works to improve the low literacy rates among women and improve socioeconomic participation in the informal and formal economic sectors, it faces an enormously complex set of challenges. The government has set lofty goals for literacy and vocational training but must coordinate these goals with international donors who have goals and strategies of their own.
Bureaucratic challenges hamper educators’ abilities to provide their services. The women recipients face practical and societal challenges accessing the education programs. Civil society groups attempt to work in the middle to accomplish what the government cannot, while addressing the myriad perspectives of all parties.
In Morocco, introducing programs in cultural terms that are acceptable to the local community is necessary for building credibility with communities often wary of change. Yet human rights advocates must also contextualize these programs within international human rights criteria in order to receive funds from international aid donors.
In order for Morocco to effectively achieve higher literacy rates for women and promote women's socioeconomic participation, a holistic strategy must be used, taking all of the challenges and goals of each of the stakeholders into consideration:
► It is absolutely essential for women to be represented in the dialogue between NGOs, the government, and aid donors in order to express their needs and concerns, so that effective strategies for social and economic reform can be enacted to promote education and economic empowerment for women in Morocco.
► International donors must also work together to create a countrywide strategy that incorporates the needs of local communities. They must do adequate research by talking to and working with local groups and organizations, which will encourage a local buy-in and an encompassing strategy to solve community problems.
► Similarly, civil society groups must communicate actual needs to aid donors in order to impact the direction of funding. (map credit)
Morocco is well on its way to achieving its goals for national literacy and a stronger economy, as long as it continues to make women a central focus and priority.


Saturday, September 10, 2011

Welcome hand for low-income women

Earlier this week I had the pleasure of acquaintance with America's 1st elected Congresswoman -- or rather, with many good women who do good works in her good name.
Her name was Jeannette Rankin. In 1916, when she was 36 years told and national women's enfranchisement was still 4 years away, voters in her native state of Montana chose Rankin, the field secretary of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, to represent them in Congress. She served from 1917 to 1919 and again from 1941 to 1943. In both of those periods the United States entered a global war, and in both, Congresswoman Rankin cast a rare vote of "No."
Her activism persisted throughout her life: she served as field secretary for the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (an organization whose other representatives included IntLawGrrls foremothers Jane Addams and Emily Greene Balch), and at age 87 she and 5,000 others in the Jeannette Rankin Brigade marched against Vietnam War.
By that time Rankin lived not in Montana, but in northeast Georgia, on a farm not far my own new home in Athens. There, as described in a biographical booklet by Dorothy Sams Newland, Rankin cofounded the Georgia Peace Society, fought naval spending bills that brought funds to her region, won a libel suit against a Macon paper that called her a Communist, traveled widely, and started girls' and boys' clubs.
On her death in 1973, Rankin left a $16,000 bequest, and on this the Athens-based Jeannette Rankin Foundation was built. (logo credit)
As I learned at the group's annual dinner this week, the Foundation focuses on a segment of society often overlooked: it gives scholarships to low-income women over 35 years of age who are pursuing college or vocational degrees.
In 1978, the fledgling Foundation awarded $500 to Barbara Dixon, a local widow who was studying nursing and caring for her young children. Since that small beginning, it's given well over $1 million in grants, to more than 600 women from all over the United States.
Some Jeannette Rankin Scholars were at the dinner: Dixon herself; another local woman, Latrena Stokes, who gave the benediction; and Patricia Garcia of Utah, a recent geology graduate who talked of her field work bringing fresh water to communities in Mexico and Nepal.
The Scholars' stories -- no less than that of Rankin and the women who devote time and energy to the Foundation -- inspired. Learn more about this most worthy nonprofit here.


Monday, August 15, 2011

On August 15

On this day in ...
... 1896 (115 years ago today), Ekaterina Fyodorovna Kolyschkine was born on a train in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, to a family from that empire's "minor nobility." Following a teen marriage to a cousin, she worked as a nurse at the beginning of World War I, then fled revolutionary Russia, 1st to Finland and then to England, where she converted to Catholicism. She immigrated to Canada with her son and husband, even as her marriage disintegrated (eventually it would be annulled). She began a career of lecturing, writing, and social activism. Remarried in 1943 and known as Catherine Doherty (right), she founded Madonna House, a global movement of missions for the poor. Doherty, who died in Canada in 1985, reportedly is under consideration for sainthood.

(Prior August 15 posts are here, here, here, and here.)

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Gender & Millennium Goals

(Part 2 of a 2-part series; Part 1 is here)

Having written in yesterday's post on "Making Justice Systems Work for Women," today I will focus on "Gender Justice and the Millennium Development Goals." These subtitles refer to the first and second parts, respectively, of Progress of the World’s Women: In Pursuit of Justice, a report that, as IntLawGrrls posted, was recently released by UN Women.
The second part of the UN Women report brings a gender perspective to evaluation of the progress that has been made with respect to realization of the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals. Agreed to by 189 countries in 2000, these goals consist of eight quantitative benchmarks that comprise a framework for eradicating poverty by 2015 (bottom) (image credit).
The most recent progress report on the goals by the United Nations Secretariat acknowledges shortcomings in the realization of the goals for women and girls. In contrast, UN Women’s report evaluates global progress toward the goals through a uniquely gendered lens, as follows:

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty & hunger
The UN Women report notes that although global poverty rates have declined, the number of unemployed women rose, from 76 million in 2007 to 87 million in 2010.
Women in Latin America, the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa are more likely to live in poor households than men. Even within households, women are less likely than men to earn cash income and, perhaps more disturbingly, 34% of women who do earn cash income have no say in how that money is spent.
Finally, the report notes that millions of women are doubly burdened by family care and domestic labor, and this further limits their choices, by preventing them from pursuing education and paid employment. The report observes that labor-saving technology such as fuel-efficient stoves, combined with affordable child care, will reduce women’s workloads and facilitate a more equitable division of household labor.

Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education
Primary school enrollment has risen for girls -- with 96 girls now enrolled for every 100 boys, up from 91 girls for every 100 boys in 1999. Yet girls remain unlikely to complete even primary education. In the Middle East and North Africa, for example, 25% of women aged 17 to 22 have fewer than four years of schooling, compared to 11.5% of men.
The education gender gap is particularly wide in rural areas. The report notes that Bolivia has made significant strides in narrowing the educational gender gap in remote areas by establishing satellite schools, which send teachers to isolated communities. Between 1992 and 2001, the percentage of rural girls who completed six years of schooling in Bolivia jumped from 47% to 74%.

Goal 3: Promote gender equality & empower women
Women have made little headway in advancing in the workforce in the past two decades. Between 1990 and 2009, the percentage of women in wage employment outside the agricultural sector rose to just 40% from 35%. Yet the Report notes that while the number of women in parliaments around the world has increased, female legislators still only account for 5% of parliamentary members globally. And even though secondary school enrollment for young women has increased in a manner similar to that of primary school enrollment, attendance rates are low and significant gaps exist between the urban rich and the rural poor in part because of poverty, early marriage and discrimination. The Report advocates the use of stipends to keep girls in school and quotas to increase women’s participation in government. Rwanda’s Constitution, for example, requires that at least 30% of its parliament be comprised of women. As noted in yesterday’s post, women’s critical mass in that legislature has already led to important legislative reforms for women.

Goal 4: Reduce child mortality
The overall mortality rate for children under 5 has dropped from 89 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 60 per 1,000 in 2009. However, prenatal sex selection and infanticide has led to significant gender disparities in child mortality rates, particularly in Asia. (See this post by IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Mallika Kaur and this NPR report.)
The UN Women report observes that the Republic of Korea -- where in the 1980s 114 boys were born for every 100 girls -- has reduced this disparity by investing in girls’ education and by promoting women’s employment. These initiatives have helped to reverse the perception that girls are a financial burden on the family.

Goal 5: Improve maternal health
Only 14 countries are on target to reduce maternal deaths by 75% by 2015. This is a shocking statistic, given that up to 70% of such fatalities are preventable through health services and family planning resources. (credit for photo of maternal health clinic in Afghanistan)
Over 300 million women around the world suffer longterm health consequences and disabilities stemming from pregnancy or childbirth complications. Reduced aid for family planning, rural isolation, user fees, and lack of female staff at health care centers are some barriers to accessing the services needed to combat this epidemic. Consider that once user fees were no longer required in Burundi, the number of women giving birth in hospitals jumped 61%.

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
Women have borne the brunt of the AIDS epidemic disproportionately. Over half the 33.3 million people living with AIDS worldwide are women.
Women are particularly vulnerable to infection as a result of poverty, violence, and discriminatory customs.
Once infected, women are further victimized. In China, for example, twice as many women as men report having been physically harassed and threatened because of their HIV status. According to the report, the Chinese government has launched a widespread campaign to combat HIV stigmatization.

Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability
The report notes that, because women perform the majority of the world’s agricultural work and are heavily impacted by weather-related disasters, they suffer the effects of climate change disproportionately.
Yet, women are often excluded from environmental policy discussions. An analysis of 423 National Adaptation Programs of Action reveals that only 16% of such plans refer to women when discussing food security or water. Less than 20% mention women in the context of health.

Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development
The good news is that overseas development assistance has risen over the past decade and, by 2015, will have reached $126 million per year.
The bad news is, programs targeting gender equality are not reaping the benefits.
Programs in which gender equality was a secondary (but significant) component accounted for less than 30% of funding from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-Development Assistance Committee between 2007 and 2009.
In November and December of 2011, the fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness will be held in the Republic of Korea. The report recommends adopting concrete actions to achieve gender equality at that meeting.

Conclusion
When it comes to gender equality, much needs to be done with respect to reaching the Millennium Development Goals. As the report put it:

'With only four years left until the target date of 2015, ending gender-based injustices that create barriers to women’s and girls’ opportunities must be the centerpiece of further action.'



Sunday, June 19, 2011

'Nuff said

Jane Mecom had 12 children; she buried 11. And then, she put down her pen.

-- Harvard History Professor Jill Lepore (right), in a fascinating New York Times essay that compared the lives of Benjamin Franklin and his younger sister, Jane Mecom. Both were born to a father who "scrap[ed] by" as a candlemaker. Yet the destinies of brother and sister were quite different. Describing the drastic differences in educational and economic opportunities open to men and women in 18th C. America, Lepore wrote:

Against poverty and ignorance, Franklin prevailed; his sister did not.


Thursday, May 19, 2011

On May 19

On this day in ...
... 1941, Lola Ridge (right) died at her home in Brooklyn, New York. (photo credit) She'd been born Rose Emily Ridge 67 years earlier in Dublin, Ireland. She and her mother eventually moved to New Zealand and Australia, where Lola grew up poor in a household that also included a stepfather who became violent when drunk. In her early 20s Ridge married, divorced, immigrated to San Francisco, settled in New York, and married again. She worked as a model, illustrator, and writer. A colleague of Emma Goldman, Ridge won recognition for her work as an editor of "avant-garde, feminist, and Marxist publications" and her own anarchist poetry. Here's a passage describing denizens of Hester Street in her poem "The Ghetto," published in a 1918 volume:
Sarah and Anna live on the floor above.
Sarah is swarthy and ill-dressed.
Life for her has no ritual.
She would break an ideal like an egg for the winged thing at the core.


(Prior May 19 tests are here, here, here, and here.)

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Guest Blogger: Lynsay Gott

It's IntLawGrrls' great pleasure to welcome Lynsay Gott (right) as today's guest blogger.
Lynsay is the Program Director at Human Rights USA in Washington, D.C. She joined that nongovernmental organization in 2007 as an Equal Justice Works Fellow, having served there as a legal intern with the organization for one year.
During her fellowship, Lynsay focused on the loopholes in U.S. law that limit the availability of asylum protections and mandate the return of some victims of human trafficking to their countries of origin where they were originally victimized. Her law review comment on this issue, “Unrealistic Burdens: How the T visa and Asylum Law Fail to Protect Many Victims of Trafficking,” was published in the Immigration and Nationality Law Review. Lynsay's work to establish asylum protection for trafficked persons has now expanded to pursuing civil remedies for survivors of trafficking.
In her guest post below, Lynsay compares the approach taken by the European Court of Justice in a recent immigrants' right decision with that taken by the U.S. Department of Justice in its challenge to Arizona's immigration law.
Holder of an M.A. in anthropology from the University of Cincinnati, Lynsay received her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of the Law.
Lynsay dedicates her post to Dr. Rhoda Halperin (below left), Professor of Anthropology at Cincinnati until 2009, when she died suddenly and unexpectedly from acute leukemia at age 62. Lynsay writes:

She was an anthropologist and a feminist, and my advisor during my master's studies in anthropology. A lot of Rhoda's work focused on economic and social justice, and the empowerment of marginalized communities, and of women in particular. It was through her influence that I entered the legal field, changing my career path from human rights research to human rights legal advocacy. She received her PhD in anthropology from Brandeis. I could not describe her any better than her colleague, Dr. Suzanne Scheld, who in this memorial article described in detail Rhoda's unique approach to feminism and social justice.

Today Halperin, whose last book was Whose School is It?: Women, Children, Memory (2006), joins IntLawGrrls' other foremothers in the list just below our "visiting from..." map at right.
Heartfelt welcome!

Monday, May 9, 2011

On May 9

On this day in ...
... 1874, Lilian Baylis (right) was born in London, England, into a performing family that called itself The Gypsy Revellers. She thus began acting, signing, and teaching music early on -- even as she worked with her aunt, Emma Cons, at settlement houses like Octavia Hill, which aided London's poor. The Baylises immigrated to South Africa when Lilian was a teenager; eventually she returned to England, where she became a renowned theatrical producer and manager. Over the years Baylis managed the Old Vic and Sadler's Wells theaters, one troupe that became the English National Opera, another that became the National Theatre, and a third that became the Royal Ballet. WikiPedia offers this anecdote displaying the impresaria's wit:

A strong, and occasionally somewhat eccentric, personality she reputedly once told an actress that her wig was unsatisfactory and would have to go back to Berts, the wigmaker.
‘But, Miss Baylis‘, protested the actress, ‘this is my own hair’.
‘I don’t care. It will have to go back to Berts.’

(Prior May 9 posts are
here, here, here, and here.)

Monday, April 11, 2011

Survivors of Sexual Violence and the African Union: A Model to Follow?

(Delighted to welcome back alumna Doris Buss, who contributes this guest post)

Women’s civil society groups from across Africa met recently with state ambassadors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, as part of a now-annual meeting of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union with civil society.
The March 28 meeting included addresses by the various ‘office holders’ below: Margot Wallström (middle), the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Litha Musyimi-Ogana (left), the Director of the Women, Gender and Development Directorate of the African Union, and Dr. Mary Chinery-Hesse (right), from the AU’s Panel of the Wise.
But the real force of the meetings came from the “Survivors of Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict”, who had traveled from Côte d’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda and Zimbabwe. The meeting included time for “first-hand accounts” from the survivors, as well as discussion of different models of civil society initiatives for rehabilitation and community reintegration.
At the end of the event the survivors of sexual violence released a Statement, which is a moving testament to the urgent health needs of sexual violence sufferers in Africa. The Statement makes a number of recommendations relating to health care, including, a call for “comprehensive medical care, including emergency surgery services, and trained medical workers on trauma management” and a recommendation that AU member states “ increase their health budget for our sexual and reproductive health complications and trauma management”.
The frustration of civil society actors in ‘post’ conflict negotiations is also clearly evident in the Statement:
We are deeply saddened by the fact that our violators and their apologists are often seated on these tables deciding our fate. We are therefore not surprised that post conflict processes do not include the concerns and priorities of survivors of sexual violence. Instead, we are often urged to let bygones be bygones and look to the future. We cannot look to the future when we are hurting physically and psychologically, and are unable to pick up the pieces of our lives.

Among the recommendations made is a call for the AU to “adopt sexual violence as a disqualifying criterion for leadership” in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1960.
As an example of civil society and state interactions, this annual meeting between the AU and victims of sexual violence may be a model to consider in other contexts. I wonder, for example, what would happen if members of the Canadian Parliament (or US House of Representatives), agreed to meet each year with a representative group of poor single mothers to hear about their lives and experiences over the past year?


Sunday, October 17, 2010

On October 17

On this day in ...
... 2010 (today), is marked the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. (image credit) The observance was established by U.N. General Assembly Resolution 47/196 (December 22, 1992) for the purpose of

promot[ing] awareness of the need to eradicate poverty and destitution in all countries, particularly in developing countries -- a need that has become a development priority.

This year's theme is "From Poverty to Decent Work: bridging the gap."


(Prior October 17 posts are here, here, and here.)

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Guest Blogger: Yvonne McDermott

It's IntLawGrrls' great pleasure to welcome Yvonne McDermott (left) as today's guest blogger.
Yvonne is a Ph.D. candidate and doctoral research fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, National University of Ireland-Galway, where she is also a Lecturer on Children's Rights. Her research focuses on due process in international criminal proceedings, and her guest post below examines the jurisprudential doctrine of abuse of process, an ongoing issue in 3 International Criminal Court cases now proceeding against defendants from the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Yvonne holds a Diploma in Irish (Gaeilge), a Bachelor of Corporate Law and a Bachelor of Laws from the National University of Ireland, Galway. In 2008, Yvonne earned an LL.M. cum laude in Public International Law from Leiden University in the Netherlands. Her scholarship includes the journal article Victims and International Law: Remedies in the Courtroom (2009), for which last year she was named the inaugural recipient of the Böhler Franken Koppe Wijngaarden advocaten Hague Academic Coalition Award for Young Professionals. Yvonne is the Managing Editor of the Oxford Reports in International Criminal Law.
Yvonne chooses to dedicate her post to 2 Irish women. Both "are perhaps better known for their associations with famous men," she writes, but both "deserve to be recognised in their own right." Yvonne continues:
Mary Ann McCracken [left; 1770-1886], the sister of executed United Irishman Henry Joy McCracken, was born in Belfast. She too was committed to social reform, and was a dedicated philanthropist and activist, committed to helping the poor of Belfast,
pioneering for equal rights for women and the abolition of slavery. There are descriptions of her at the age of 88 handing out leaflets at the docks of Belfast to those heading for the southern ports of the United States, where slavery was still practiced.
Maud Gonne [below right; 1866-1953] was born in England but her legacy is cemented as a pivotal player in the Irish struggle for independence. She was particularly involved in countering evictions and in famine relief in counties Connaught in the late 19th century. She was the founder of Inghinidhe na hÉireann (Daughters of Ireland), an Irish nationalist feminist organisation, in 1900, and was fiercely devoted to the promotion and preservation of Irish culture through the arts. In spite of her own achievements, Maud Gonne is often celebrated as the muse of William Butler Yeats and the mother of diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner, Seán MacBride.
Today Gonne (prior post) and McCracken join the foremothers' list just below our "visiting from..." map in the righthand column -- and thus also join what Yvonne aptly calls "the wonderful Mná na hÉireann so honoured on this blog before me." The "Women of Ireland" to whom she refers are foremothers Grace O'Malley/Gráinne Ní Mháille, Eva Gore-Booth, Mary Harris "Mother" Jones, Eibhlín Dhubh Ní Chonaill, Hanna Sheehy Skeffington, and Constance Markiewicz.

Heartfelt welcome!